Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Campusano

State v. Campusano

813 So. 2d 301, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5231, 2002 WL 662978
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 22, 2002
DocketNo. 3D02-1061
StatusPublished

This text of 813 So. 2d 301 (State v. Campusano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Campusano, 813 So. 2d 301, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5231, 2002 WL 662978 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of prohibition. The respondents commendably concede that the trial judge improperly reconsidered the disqualification order, and improperly attempted to refute the charges of partiality in the motion. Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla.1978); State v. Schack, 617 So.2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, we grant the petition, withholding the writ in reliance upon the trial court abiding by our decision. This cause is remanded with directions to the Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit to reassign this case to another trial judge.

Prohibition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Schack
617 So. 2d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
813 So. 2d 301, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5231, 2002 WL 662978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-campusano-fladistctapp-2002.