State v. Camper

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Camper

356 So. 2d 1329, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15266

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 4, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1899

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 356 So. 2d 1329 (State v. Camper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Camper, 356 So. 2d 1329, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

MOORE, Judge.

The State appeals the granting of appel-lee’s motion for discharge pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(1). In Eaddy v. State, 352 So.2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) this court held that the speedy trial time does not begin to run in favor of an individual who is incarcerated in another jurisdiction and against whom a detainer has been lodged until the authority which filed the detainer obtains custody of the individual. It is unfortunate that the learned trial judge was without the benefit of Eaddy, supra, at the time of his decision. Accordingly, the trial court’s order discharging the appellee is REVERSED and this cause REMANDED with instructions to reinstate the charges against the appellee.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOORE, Judge.

The State appeals the granting of appel-lee’s motion for discharge pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(1). In Eaddy v. State, 352 So.2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) this court held that the speedy trial time does not begin to run in favor of an individual who is incarcerated in another jurisdiction and against whom a detainer has been lodged until the authority which filed the detainer obtains custody of the individual. It is unfortunate that the learned trial judge was without the benefit of Eaddy, supra, at the time of his decision. Accordingly, the trial court’s order discharging the appellee is REVERSED and this cause REMANDED with instructions to reinstate the charges against the appellee.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 So. 2d 1329, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-camper-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack