State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Campbell

DecidedOctober 9, 2019

Docket2019-UP-332

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Campbell (State v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Campbell, (S.C. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Bernard Campbell, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002457

Appeal From Greenville County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-332 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Slocumb, 426 S.C. 297, 314-15, 827 S.E.2d 148, 157 (2019) ("Neither Graham[1] nor the Eighth Amendment . . . currently prohibits the imposition of aggregate sentences for multiple offenses amounting to a de facto life sentence on a juvenile nonhomicide offender."); State v. Finley, 427 S.C. 419, 427, 831 S.E.2d 158, 162 (Ct. App. 2019) ("[A juvenile offender] is not entitled to resentencing pursuant to Miller and Byars . . . . [when his] sentence afforded [him] parole eligibility . . . .").

AFFIRMED.2

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1 Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). 2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Bernard Campbell, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002457

Appeal From Greenville County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-332 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Slocumb, 426 S.C. 297, 314-15, 827 S.E.2d 148, 157 (2019) ("Neither Graham[1] nor the Eighth Amendment . . . currently prohibits the imposition of aggregate sentences for multiple offenses amounting to a de facto life sentence on a juvenile nonhomicide offender."); State v. Finley, 427 S.C. 419, 427, 831 S.E.2d 158, 162 (Ct. App. 2019) ("[A juvenile offender] is not entitled to resentencing pursuant to Miller and Byars . . . . [when his] sentence afforded [him] parole eligibility . . . .").

AFFIRMED.2

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1 Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). 2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Campbell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-campbell-scctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack