State v. Campbell

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Campbell

2012 Ohio 6192, 984 N.E.2d 1068, 135 Ohio St. 3d 149

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 31, 2012

Docket2012-1519

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 6192 (State v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Campbell, 2012 Ohio 6192, 984 N.E.2d 1068, 135 Ohio St. 3d 149 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the appellate court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decisions in State v. Brunning, 134 Ohio St.3d 438, 2012-Ohio-5752, 983 N.E.2d 316, and State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents. Kennedy, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the appellate court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decisions in State v. Brunning, 134 Ohio St.3d 438, 2012-Ohio-5752, 983 N.E.2d 316, and State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents. Kennedy, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2012 Ohio 6192, 984 N.E.2d 1068, 135 Ohio St. 3d 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-campbell-ohio-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack