State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Campbell

165 S.E.2d 341, 3 N.C. App. 592, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1632

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1969

DocketNo. 6917SC104

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 165 S.E.2d 341 (State v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Campbell, 165 S.E.2d 341, 3 N.C. App. 592, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1632 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.

This is another typical case where the system breaks down. The defendant, without expense to himself, has called upon the taxpayers to furnish him with an attorney to present this matter to this Court. This attorney has reviewed the proceedings and, after such review, has filed a brief in which he frankly states that he finds no errors. The Attorney General has reviewed the record on appeal and agrees with the defense counsel that no prejudicial error has been made to appear.

We, likewise, have reviewed the record on appeal, and we conclude that no error has been made to appear. Compare with State v. Fowler, 3 N.C. App. 232, 164 S.E. 2d 387.

Affirmed.

BROCK and Morris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI