State v. Campbell

163 S.E.2d 78, 2 N.C. App. 406, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 941
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided September 18, 1968·No. No. 6822SC307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Britt, J.

Following his conviction in Superior Court, defendant requested that an attorney other than his trial attorney be assigned to represent him on appeal to this Court. Attorney L. Hugh West, Jr., was appointed and proceeded to perfect the appeal; however, said attorney states in the record that he has carefully read the record and the law with respect thereto and can find nothing in the record which he can in good faith assign as error. At the same time, he requests that this Court carefully review-the record and grant the defendant a new trial if reversible error is discovered.

Accordingly we- have carefully reviewed the entire record in this case and find that the defendant was given a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and that the sentences imposed were within statu[407] tory limits. State v. Hopper, 271 N.C. 464, 156 S.E. 2d 857; State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330.

The judgment of the Superior Court is Affirmed.

BrocK and Parker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Campbell, 163 S.E.2d 78, 2 N.C. App. 406, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 941 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968).

163 S.E.2d 78 (State v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
164 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)