State v. . Campbell

114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 765, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 179
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 20, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 114 S.E. 927 (State v. . Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Campbell, 114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 765, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 179 (N.C. 1922).

Opinion

Stacy, J.

In the spring of 1922, the defendant was chief orderly and chief of police at the Government Hospital, Oteen, near Asheville, N. 0. Mrs. Annie Smathers, a young widow, was one of the telephone operators at Oteen. There is evidence tending to show that Campbell, the defendant, was courting Mrs. Smathers, with a view to marriage. On the morning of the homicide, he stated to the witness, T. R. Parker : “I want to see her one more time and ask her to marry me. If she don’t, she can’t marry any other man.”

In the afternoon of 6 May, 1922, the deceased, Mrs. Smathers, was riding with the defendant in his automobile on the Fairview road, near the village of Fairview, in Buncombe County, when she was seen to *766 jump from the moving car and run across tbe road as if sbe were trying to get away from tbe defendant. Tbe defendant stopped bis car, jumped out himself; pursued tbe deceased, wbo was running rapidly, for twtelve or fifteen yards, and tben opened fire upon ber witb bis pistol.. When sbe fell, be deliberately stood over ber prostrate body and fired two or three bullets into ber bead. Any one of at least three of tbe shots would have been fatal.

On trial, tbe defendant set up a plea of insanity; but this was not established to tbe satisfaction of the jury. S. v. Terry, 173 N. C., 761.

There are no assignments of error incorporated in tbe statement of case on appeal (174 N. C., 832, Eule 19 (2) ; but, on account of tbe gravity of tbe offense, we have examined all of tbe exceptions witb care, and find them to be without sufficient merit to warrant a reversal or an order for a new trial.

Tbe record presents no error in law, and we must affirm tbe judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Vernon
180 S.E. 340 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Stafford
166 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Jones
166 S.E. 163 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Walker
137 S.E. 429 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 765, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-campbell-nc-1922.