State v. Campbell

438 So. 2d 1030, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22485
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1983·No. No. AR-132·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting Campbell’s motion to suppress evidence. The officer (a wildlife officer with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission) who stopped and detained Campbell and his vehicle did not have sufficient information that criminal activity was afoot to justify a brief investigatory stop. United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). Nor did Campbell’s operation of his vehicle justify the officer’s stopping Campbell for a traffic offense. Brown v. State, 62 So.2d 348 (Fla.1953); Bailey v. State, 319 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975); compare State v. Turner, 345 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Campbell, 438 So. 2d 1030, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22485 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

438 So. 2d 1030 (State v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilhelm v. State
515 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Turner v. Harmon
438 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)