State v. Cammann

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cammann

792 S.W.2d 707, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1156, 1990 WL 107013

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 1990·No. No. 55820·Published

Opinion

[708]*708ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of offering to commit violence to an officer of a correctional institution, a violation of § 217.385, RSMo 1986 (repealed and reenacted in 1989); and the court sentenced him as a persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment to be served consecutively to any sentences then being served. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[708]*708ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of offering to commit violence to an officer of a correctional institution, a violation of § 217.385, RSMo 1986 (repealed and reenacted in 1989); and the court sentenced him as a persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment to be served consecutively to any sentences then being served. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Cammann, 792 S.W.2d 707, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1156, 1990 WL 107013 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

792 S.W.2d 707 (State v. Cammann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.