State v. CALMESE
This text of 202 S.W.3d 32 (State v. CALMESE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jamie Cálmese (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties *33 and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err nor abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 S.W.3d 32, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1375, 2006 WL 2671004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-calmese-moctapp-2006.