State v. CALMESE

202 S.W.3d 32, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1375, 2006 WL 2671004
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2006·No. ED 87216·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Cálmese (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties *33 and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err nor abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. CALMESE, 202 S.W.3d 32, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1375, 2006 WL 2671004 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

202 S.W.3d 32 (State v. CALMESE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Craig v. State
202 S.W.3d 32 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)