State v. Callender

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Callender

149 So. 466, 177 La. 821, 1933 La. LEXIS 1757

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 7, 1933

DocketNo. 32364.

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 466 (State v. Callender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Callender, 149 So. 466, 177 La. 821, 1933 La. LEXIS 1757 (La. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendants were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for the larceny “of a Packard automobile of the value of one thousand dollars,” and have appealed.

No bill of exceptions was taken to any proceeding in the case; no assignment of error has been, filed; and an examination of the record fails to disclose any error patent on the face thereof. Hence, there is no question of law presented for review.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendants were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for the larceny “of a Packard automobile of the value of one thousand dollars,” and have appealed.

No bill of exceptions was taken to any proceeding in the case; no assignment of error has been, filed; and an examination of the record fails to disclose any error patent on the face thereof. Hence, there is no question of law presented for review.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 466, 177 La. 821, 1933 La. LEXIS 1757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-callender-la-1933.