State v. Caldwell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Caldwell

948 S.W.2d 275, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1305, 1997 WL 400056

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Caldwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1433 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 15, 1997·No. No. 70508·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Caldwell (Defendant) appeals from Ms conviction, after a jury trial, for one count of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of twelve years and three years, respectively. Defendant alleges the trial court plainly erred when it did not sua sponte intervene to halt numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Caldwell (Defendant) appeals from Ms conviction, after a jury trial, for one count of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of twelve years and three years, respectively. Defendant alleges the trial court plainly erred when it did not sua sponte intervene to halt numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Caldwell, 948 S.W.2d 275, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1305, 1997 WL 400056 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

948 S.W.2d 275 (State v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.