State v. Cain
This text of 963 S.W.2d 475 (State v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant Gary Cain appeals from the judgment entered after his jury conviction for felony stealing, in violation of Section 570.030 RSMo (1994). The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to four months in the county jail.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the facts and reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
963 S.W.2d 475, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 423, 1998 WL 109827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cain-moctapp-1998.