State v. Cain

599 A.2d 383, 220 Conn. 931, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 508
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 13, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 599 A.2d 383 (State v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cain, 599 A.2d 383, 220 Conn. 931, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 508 (Colo. 1991).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 503, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Do Practice Book §§ 748 through 755 require a municipality to preserve and produce 911 tapes?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly establish a one year retention period for such tapes?

“3. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper harmless error standard to the destruction of the 911 tape in this case?

“4. What was the effect of the defendant’s failure promptly to seek preservation of the 911 tape in this case?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cain
613 A.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 A.2d 383, 220 Conn. 931, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cain-conn-1991.