State v. Cain
This text of 599 A.2d 383 (State v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 503, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Do Practice Book §§ 748 through 755 require a municipality to preserve and produce 911 tapes?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly establish a one year retention period for such tapes?
“3. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper harmless error standard to the destruction of the 911 tape in this case?
“4. What was the effect of the defendant’s failure promptly to seek preservation of the 911 tape in this case?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 A.2d 383, 220 Conn. 931, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cain-conn-1991.