State v. . Cagle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Cagle

147 S.E. 925, 197 N.C. 778, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 365

DecidedApril 24, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 925 (State v. . Cagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Cagle, 147 S.E. 925, 197 N.C. 778, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 365 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered in behalf of the State tended to show that the defendant killed the deceased intentionally. Upon the other hand the evidence for the defendant tended to show that the killing was accidental. Roth phases of the case were fairly submitted to the jury and the pertinent principles of law properly applied. It appears to us that the defendant has had a fair trial, and there is no error of law appearing in the record. Hence the judgment must stand.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered in behalf of the State tended to show that the defendant killed the deceased intentionally. Upon the other hand the evidence for the defendant tended to show that the killing was accidental. Roth phases of the case were fairly submitted to the jury and the pertinent principles of law properly applied. It appears to us that the defendant has had a fair trial, and there is no error of law appearing in the record. Hence the judgment must stand.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E. 925, 197 N.C. 778, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cagle-nc-1929.