State v. Cady
This text of 243 S.E.2d 378 (State v. Cady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant brings forward no assignments of error, merely requesting a review of the record to determine whether prejudicial error occurred in his trial and if so, whether he is entitled to a new trial.
We have reviewed the record in detail and find very few objections. Able defense counsel, with commendable frankness, has assigned no errors for the obvious reason that there were none. The case was well prepared and prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Wade E. Byrd. An able trial judge, Giles Clark, presided. After a careful study of the record, we find that defendant has received a fair trial in which there was
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 S.E.2d 378, 295 N.C. 86, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cady-nc-1978.