State v. Cadle
266 S.W.3d 886, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 2008 WL 4701318
Opinion
ORDER
Christopher Cadle challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010 RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cadle, 266 S.W.3d 886, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 2008 WL 4701318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
266 S.W.3d 886 (State v. Cadle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charron v. State
266 S.W.3d 886 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)