State v. Cadle
266 S.W.3d 886, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 2008 WL 4701318
This text of 266 S.W.3d 886 (State v. Cadle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cadle, 266 S.W.3d 886, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 2008 WL 4701318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
Christopher Cadle challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010 RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Charron v. State
266 S.W.3d 886 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
266 S.W.3d 886, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 2008 WL 4701318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cadle-moctapp-2008.