State v. Cadenhead
313 S.W.3d 732, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 2010 WL 2569210
Opinion
Order
Cortez Cadenhead appeals his convictions of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. He argues that the trial court plainly erred in its failure to intervene sua sponte to exclude police testimony that his co-participant’s confession was consistent with Cadenhead’s confession. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cadenhead, 313 S.W.3d 732, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 2010 WL 2569210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
313 S.W.3d 732 (State v. Cadenhead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. HEARTLAND GOLF DEVELOPMENT II, LLC
313 S.W.3d 732 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)