State v. Cadenhead
313 S.W.3d 732, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 2010 WL 2569210
This text of 313 S.W.3d 732 (State v. Cadenhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cadenhead, 313 S.W.3d 732, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 2010 WL 2569210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
Order
Cortez Cadenhead appeals his convictions of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. He argues that the trial court plainly erred in its failure to intervene sua sponte to exclude police testimony that his co-participant’s confession was consistent with Cadenhead’s confession. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anderson v. HEARTLAND GOLF DEVELOPMENT II, LLC
313 S.W.3d 732 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
313 S.W.3d 732, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 2010 WL 2569210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cadenhead-moctapp-2010.