State v. Cabbagestalk

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Cabbagestalk

487 So. 2d 1055, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 205, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1950

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1986

DocketNo. 66993

StatusPublished

This text of 487 So. 2d 1055 (State v. Cabbagestalk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cabbagestalk, 487 So. 2d 1055, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 205, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1950 (Fla. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ADKINS, Justice.

In Cabbagestalk v. State, 473 So.2d 718 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the Fourth District, on the authority of Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), held the exclusionary rule applicable to probation revocation proceedings and certified to this Court the following question:

Under the 1983 amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Because we have recently answered this question in the affirmative in State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla.1986), we ap[1056]*1056prove the decision of the district court on the authority of Cross.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI