State v. C. O.

700 So. 2d 169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1997 WL 632049
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1997
DocketNo. 96-3229
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 700 So. 2d 169 (State v. C. O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. C. O., 700 So. 2d 169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1997 WL 632049 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state failed to timely object when the trial court placed appellee in a drug treatment program as an alternative to imposing a penalty or sentence.

[170]*170Accordingly, we affirm the trial courts dismissal of the charges. See State v. Upshaw, 648 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. R.B.
711 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 So. 2d 169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1997 WL 632049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-c-o-fladistctapp-1997.