State v. C. O.

700 So. 2d 169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1997 WL 632049
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1997·No. No. 96-3229·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state failed to timely object when the trial court placed appellee in a drug treatment program as an alternative to imposing a penalty or sentence.

[170] Accordingly, we affirm the trial courts dismissal of the charges. See State v. Upshaw, 648 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. C. O., 700 So. 2d 169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11559, 1997 WL 632049 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

700 So. 2d 169 (State v. C. O.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. R.B.
711 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)