State v. C. E. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. C. E. K.

296 P.3d 624, 255 Or. App. 179

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 6, 2013

Docket120939; A151337

StatusPublished

This text of 296 P.3d 624 (State v. C. E. K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. C. E. K., 296 P.3d 624, 255 Or. App. 179 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself or others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree with and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself or others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree with and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 P.3d 624, 255 Or. App. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-c-e-k-orctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack