State v. C. D. L. M.
344 P.3d 511, 269 Or. App. 248, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 154
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He argues that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. C. D. L. M., 344 P.3d 511, 269 Or. App. 248, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 154 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
344 P.3d 511 (State v. C. D. L. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.