State v. C. B.

227 P.3d 209, 234 Or. App. 214, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 176
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 3, 2010·No. 08MH0008MS; A139944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record,1 we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. C. B., 227 P.3d 209, 234 Or. App. 214, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 176 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

227 P.3d 209 (State v. C. B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Cb
227 P.3d 209 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)