State v. C. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. C. B.

227 P.3d 209, 234 Or. App. 214, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 176

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 3, 2010

Docket08MH0008MS; A139944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 P.3d 209 (State v. C. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. C. B., 227 P.3d 209, 234 Or. App. 214, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 176 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record,¹ we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record,¹ we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 P.3d 209, 234 Or. App. 214, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-c-b-orctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack