State v. Byrd
This text of 742 N.E.2d 135 (State v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hamilton App. No. C-830676. On January 26, 2001, appellant filed a motion for stay of execution pending litigation of actual innocence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied as premature.
It appearing that appellant’s petition for rehearing of the order denying certiorari is pending before the United States Supreme Court,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee file notice with this court when the United States Supreme Court issues its order on appellant’s motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 N.E.2d 135, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1435, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-byrd-ohio-2001.