State v. . Byrd
This text of 167 S.E. 626 (State v. . Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant drew two checks on the Bank of Spruce Pine payable to the order of the Climax Manufacturing Company. Both checks were post-dated — that is, the date on each check was later than the real date of its issue: The question is whether the defendant is guilty of giving a worthless check in violation of section 4283(a) of the Consolidated Statutes.
The trial court instructed the jury to convict the defendant if they believed the evidence and found beyond a reasonable doubt that he had given the checks, and that it made no difference whether the checks were or were not post-dated.
They were given for a past account and if post-dated did not import criminal liability. S. v. Crawford, 198 N. C., 522. For error in the instruction the defendant is entitled to a new trial.
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 S.E. 626, 204 N.C. 162, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-byrd-nc-1933.