State v. . Bynum

154 S.E. 918, 199 N.C. 376, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 122
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 10, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 154 S.E. 918 (State v. . Bynum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Bynum, 154 S.E. 918, 199 N.C. 376, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 122 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J\

At the May Term, 1930, Wilson Superior Court, the defendants herein, Wright Bynum and William Bandall, were tried upon an indictment charging them with the murder of one Callie Willi-ford, which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death as to both of the defendants. From the verdict thus rendered and judgment entered thereon, the defendants gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, but this has not been perfected as required by the rules, in fact nothing has been done looking to this end.

As the attempted appeal is in forma pauperis, and the affidavit for leave to appeal without giving security for costs fails to state, as required by C. S., 4651, that “the application, is in good faith,” it may be *377 doubted as to whether we have any jurisdiction to hear the matter. S. v. Brumfield, 198 N. C., 613. Nevertheless, as the case is a capital one, we have examined the papers and find no error on the face of the record proper.

The motion of the State must be allowed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Brumfield
152 S.E. 926 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 S.E. 918, 199 N.C. 376, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bynum-nc-1930.