State v. Byers

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Byers

545 So. 2d 931, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1236, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2837, 1989 WL 52608

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 1989·No. Nos. 88-02488 to 88-02492 and 88-02494 to 88-02496·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

In these eight appeals, which the court has consolidated on its own motion, the state challenges the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Because the notices of appeal were filed more than fifteen days after the judgments and sentences were rendered, we dismiss the appeals as untimely filed. See State v. Hieber, 541 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Ealy, 533 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). As in Hieber and Ealy, we acknowl[932]*932edge that our decision is in conflict with State v. Williams, 463 So.2d 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

In these eight appeals, which the court has consolidated on its own motion, the state challenges the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Because the notices of appeal were filed more than fifteen days after the judgments and sentences were rendered, we dismiss the appeals as untimely filed. See State v. Hieber, 541 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Ealy, 533 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). As in Hieber and Ealy, we acknowl[932]*932edge that our decision is in conflict with State v. Williams, 463 So.2d 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

State v. Byers, 545 So. 2d 931, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1236, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2837, 1989 WL 52608 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

545 So. 2d 931 (State v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related