State v. Butler

103 S.E. 762, 114 S.C. 433, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 152
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 26, 1920·No. 10473·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Gary.

The defendant was tried at the October, 1919, term of the Court of General Sessions for Spartanburg county, upon the charge of assault with intent to ravish. The defendant denied the facts narrated in the testimony of the prosecutrix, and set up the defense that he was not present at the time of the alleged assault — -in other words, an alibi.

The jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and the defendant was sentenced to be electrocuted on the 5th day of December, 1919. He appealed upon numerous exceptions, which will be reported. The prosecutrix thus testified:

“Q. Now, just state what happened to you on Monday morning, the 15th day of last September. A. I was on my way to my work in Spartanburg. Q. What road did you have to travel to come to Spartanburg? A. Highland avenue. Q. Is your house outside the city limits ? A. Just in. Q. In coming from your residence to work, through what portion of the town do you travel? A. Southwestern. Q. *440 Then you come through the colored district? A. Yes, sir. Q. As you come away from your home the first 200 or 300 yards, what is there along the road? A. Just a field; not anything. Q. How does your house sit with respect to that piece of woods you had to pass coming to the city — down the hill, is it not; practically out of sight, except the top, the upper story, from that point? A. Yes, sir. Q. About what time of day was it, when you came along near where this piece of woods is, that morning? A. About 8 o’clock. Q. When you approached these woods whom did you see, if anybody? A. I didn’t see any one until this Grover approached me. Q. How close were you to the woods? A. I was 8 or 10 feet from the edge of the woods. Q. Had you seen any one up to that time? A. No, sir. Q. How did he approach you — just speak so this gentleman over here can hear you? A. He said, %ady, can you change $5 ?’ Asked me if I could change $5. I told him I did not have any change — perhaps, if he would go down to the house, my father could change it. He said, T will give you $100 for your person,’ and w.th that he ran out and grabbed me about the waist. Q. What did he say as he grabbed you? A. He said, T want you.’ Q What part of your body did he grab you? A. He grabbed me around the waist, with his left hand. Q. What, if anything, did he have in his right hand? A. He tried to get his right over my mouth. Q. How long did he engage you in the struggle before you got loose? A. I could not say— just a short while. Q. How did you get loose ? A. I jerked loose. I had on this patent leather belt, and his hand slipped, and when his hand slipped I jumped to my feet and screamed, and when I screamed he ran down through the woods. Q. You say you jumped to your feet? A. I fell to the.ground when he grabbed me, and I screamed as I was (oming up, and he ran down through the woods. Q. AA/hat portion of your wearing apparel did you .lose ? A I lost a comb I was wearing iñ *441 my hair. Q. Did you lose any other part of your wearing apparel? A. Dost no other part of my wearing apparel. Q. Did you know at that time that you had lost your comb ? A. I did not. Q. What became of him? A. He ran down through the woods. Q. That piece of woods would be to your right coming towards the city? A. Yes, sir. Q. What is on the left? A. It is an open field on the left. Q. What house, if any, is near there? A. Not any. Q. Tolerably near ? A. There is a negro house. Q. Is, or not, that house this way coming towards Spartanburg? A. This way; yes, sir. Q. Did you see any one around that house at' that time? A. No, sir; I did not. Q. Did you see any one in hearing or sight there when he came to where you were? A. No, sir. Q. When he ran what did you do? A. I was so stunned I just stood there, and then I started down to my home and told my father. Q. When was the next time you came to the place, and whom did you come with where this happened ? A. I came back later. I came with Sheriff White and Mr. Lancaster and my father, and two other gentlemen; I don’t remember the names; two other officers, I think. Q. Did you point out to them the place where he grabbed you in the road? A. Yes,- sir. Q. Where the struggle took place? A. Yes, sir. Q. And did you or not show them where he left through the woods ? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you or not describe his personal appearance to them? A. Yes, sir. Q. After that time, then, do you know who did that now? Do you know the man that grabbed you? A. Yes, sir. Q. Who is he? A. That Grover — • Q. Is this he over here? A. Yes, sir. Q. You are confident that is the man. A. Yes, sir. Q. When was the first time you saw him afterwards? A. At the county jail. Q. Did you identify him there? A. Yes, sir. Q. Who were present? A. My father and my sister, Sheriff White, and Mr. Lloyd, and Chief Hill, and Mr. Lancaster, and Mr. Haddon. Q. Did anybody aid you in making this identification? You *442 made it unaided and alone? A. Yes, sir. Q. Positively? A. Yes, sir. Q. Before you identified him, did they present to you some other person? A. Yes, sir. Q. (Where is that fellow? What is your name? A. Kelly Thompson.) Was this man presented to you for identification? A. Yes, sir. (Objection.)
“The Court: It is a circumstance testing the accuracy of her identification — it is just a circumstance for the consideration of the jury; they may give it any weight they want to. I think it is proper for it to come out.
“Q. (By C. P. Sims, Esq.) : I would like to ask her if this defendant was present when this alleged transaction, of which she is now testifying, took place. If he was not present, we would ask if, under those circumstances, the testimony is competent.
“The Court: I think it is proper for it to come out.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Butler, 103 S.E. 762, 114 S.C. 433, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 152 (S.C. 1920).

103 S.E. 762 (State v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estep v. State
286 A.2d 187 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1972)
State v. Floyd
177 S.E. 375 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)