State v. Butler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Butler

889 S.W.2d 111, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694, 1994 WL 594105

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 1994·No. No. 63688·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction in a court-tried case for failure to return leased property, a class A misdemeanor. § 578.150, RSMo Supp.1998. He was sentenced to seven days in the custody of the Department of Justice Services. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction in a court-tried case for failure to return leased property, a class A misdemeanor. § 578.150, RSMo Supp.1998. He was sentenced to seven days in the custody of the Department of Justice Services. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Butler, 889 S.W.2d 111, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694, 1994 WL 594105 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

889 S.W.2d 111 (State v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.