State v. Butler

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Butler

462 So. 2d 184, 1985 La. LEXIS 7881

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 25, 1985

DocketNo. 84-KK-2185

StatusPublished

This text of 462 So. 2d 184 (State v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Butler, 462 So. 2d 184, 1985 La. LEXIS 7881 (La. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

Denied. The State of Louisiana in the person of the prosecutor was party to this case when concurrent sentences were imposed. The prosecutor has not objected to the imposition of the concurrent sentences and has not sought to have that condition of defendant’s sentences set aside. The custodian of the defendant is obligated to see that only the sentence imposed is the sentence served. Accordingly DOC is to run Butler’s time concurrently as ordered by Judge Waltzer. See State ex rel. Almore v. Criminal District Court, 433 So.2d 712 (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denied. The State of Louisiana in the person of the prosecutor was party to this case when concurrent sentences were imposed. The prosecutor has not objected to the imposition of the concurrent sentences and has not sought to have that condition of defendant’s sentences set aside. The custodian of the defendant is obligated to see that only the sentence imposed is the sentence served. Accordingly DOC is to run Butler’s time concurrently as ordered by Judge Waltzer. See State ex rel. Almore v. Criminal District Court, 433 So.2d 712 (1983).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

462 So. 2d 184, 1985 La. LEXIS 7881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-butler-la-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack