State v. Butler
462 So. 2d 184, 1985 La. LEXIS 7881
Opinions
Denied. The State of Louisiana in the person of the prosecutor was party to this case when concurrent sentences were imposed. The prosecutor has not objected to the imposition of the concurrent sentences and has not sought to have that condition of defendant’s sentences set aside. The custodian of the defendant is obligated to see that only the sentence imposed is the sentence served. Accordingly DOC is to run Butler’s time concurrently as ordered by Judge Waltzer. See State ex rel. Almore v. Criminal District Court, 433 So.2d 712 (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Butler, 462 So. 2d 184, 1985 La. LEXIS 7881 (La. 1985).
462 So. 2d 184 (State v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Almore v. CRIMINAL DIST CT. PARISH OF ORLEANS
433 So. 2d 712 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)