State v. Buster

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Buster

608 A.2d 692, 222 Conn. 909, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 189

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 21, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 263, is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence certain remarks attributed to a nonparty witness contained in the written statement of another witness, pursuant to [910] State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 514 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986)?

Michael A. Fitzpatrick, special public defender, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 21, 1992

“2. If the ruling was erroneous, was it harmful?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 263, is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence certain remarks attributed to a nonparty witness contained in the written statement of another witness, pursuant to [910] State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 514 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986)?

Michael A. Fitzpatrick, special public defender, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 21, 1992

“2. If the ruling was erroneous, was it harmful?”

State v. Buster, 608 A.2d 692, 222 Conn. 909, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 189 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

608 A.2d 692 (State v. Buster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related