Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Buster

State v. Buster

608 A.2d 692, 222 Conn. 909, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 189
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 21, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 608 A.2d 692 (State v. Buster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Buster, 608 A.2d 692, 222 Conn. 909, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 189 (Colo. 1992).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 263, is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence certain remarks attributed to a nonparty witness contained in the written statement of another witness, pursuant to [910]*910State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 514 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986)?

Michael A. Fitzpatrick, special public defender, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 21, 1992

“2. If the ruling was erroneous, was it harmful?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. DeFusco
620 A.2d 746 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
State v. Buster
620 A.2d 110 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 A.2d 692, 222 Conn. 909, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buster-conn-1992.