State v. Busque

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Busque

628 A.2d 984, 226 Conn. 910, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 229

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 17, 1993

DocketSC 14794

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 628 A.2d 984 (State v. Busque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Busque, 628 A.2d 984, 226 Conn. 910, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 229 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 120 (AC 9727), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude:

“1. In reviewing a nonconstitutional claim, that evidence was more prejudicial than probative, when the claim was unpreserved?

“2. In ignoring the trial court’s narrow ruling on admissibility, and instead examining the details of testimony admitted after the ruling, in deciding whether the court abused its discretion in admitting such evidence as was relevant to the limited purpose?

“3. In finding the limited use of the evidence harmful, when the jury was already well aware of the defendant’s misconduct?”

[911]*911The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14794. James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in opposition. Decided June 17, 1993

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI