State v. Bush

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bush

93 Ohio St. 3d 1282

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 10, 2001

Docket01-1161

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1282 (State v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bush, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1282 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Union App. No. 14-2000-44. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 9-10 of the court of appeals’ Opinion dated May 25, 2001:

“[W]hether a motion made pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 is subject to the time constraints contained in R.C. 2953.21 and R.C. 2953.23 and must be treated as a petition for post-conviction relief in the event that the time for direct appeal has passed and the motion is based upon alleged constitutional violations.”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 01-1247, State v. Bush, Union App. No. 14-2000-44.

The conflict cases are State v. Cale (Mar. 23, 2001), Lake App. No. 2000-L-034, unreported, 2001 WL 285794; and State v. Talley (Jan. 30, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16479, unreported, 1998 WL 31516.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union App. No. 14-2000-44. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 9-10 of the court of appeals’ Opinion dated May 25, 2001:

“[W]hether a motion made pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 is subject to the time constraints contained in R.C. 2953.21 and R.C. 2953.23 and must be treated as a petition for post-conviction relief in the event that the time for direct appeal has passed and the motion is based upon alleged constitutional violations.”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 01-1247, State v. Bush, Union App. No. 14-2000-44.

The conflict cases are State v. Cale (Mar. 23, 2001), Lake App. No. 2000-L-034, unreported, 2001 WL 285794; and State v. Talley (Jan. 30, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16479, unreported, 1998 WL 31516.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bush-ohio-2001.