State v. Burwell

51 Kan. 403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Kan. 686
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1893·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

O. J. Burwell was convicted for willfully and feloniously receiving stolen property. The penalty adjudged was imprisonment at hard labor in the state penitentiary for a period of five years. He appeals to this court, and alleges as the principal error a remark made by the trial [404]*404judge upon an objection to incompetent testimony. The attorney general insists that the record is not in a condition to justify a review. An examination shows that it embraces nothing beyond what is called a bill of exceptions. The certificate of the clerk, by which the sufficiency of the record is to be measured, is, that it is a true and complete copy of the original bill of exceptions, but he does not certify that it is a full and correct transcript of the record of the cause. This is a fatal omission, and the appeal must be dismissed. (Neiswender v. James, 41 Kas. 463; Westbrook v. Schmaus, ante, p. 214.)

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Burwell, 51 Kan. 403 (kan 1893).

51 Kan. 403 (State v. Burwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neiswender v. James
41 Kan. 463 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)