State v. Burwell

51 Kan. 403
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 51 Kan. 403 (State v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Burwell, 51 Kan. 403 (kan 1893).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

O. J. Burwell was convicted for willfully and feloniously receiving stolen property. The penalty adjudged was imprisonment at hard labor in the state penitentiary for a period of five years. He appeals to this court, and alleges as the principal error a remark made by the trial [404]*404judge upon an objection to incompetent testimony. The attorney general insists that the record is not in a condition to justify a review. An examination shows that it embraces nothing beyond what is called a bill of exceptions. The certificate of the clerk, by which the sufficiency of the record is to be measured, is, that it is a true and complete copy of the original bill of exceptions, but he does not certify that it is a full and correct transcript of the record of the cause. This is a fatal omission, and the appeal must be dismissed. (Neiswender v. James, 41 Kas. 463; Westbrook v. Schmaus, ante, p. 214.)

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neiswender v. James
41 Kan. 463 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Kan. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burwell-kan-1893.