State v. Burton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Burton

438 S.W.3d 451, 2014 WL 3823808, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 835

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burton. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 896 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 5, 2014·No. No. WD 76505·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Burton appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him and sentencing him on a charge of driving while intoxicated as an “aggravated offender.” Burton argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence and in denying his request to subpoena jurors post-trial regarding misconduct. [452]*452Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Burton appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him and sentencing him on a charge of driving while intoxicated as an “aggravated offender.” Burton argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence and in denying his request to subpoena jurors post-trial regarding misconduct. [452]*452Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

State v. Burton, 438 S.W.3d 451, 2014 WL 3823808, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 835 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

438 S.W.3d 451 (State v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.