State v. Burton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Burton

627 So. 2d 1346, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 1993 WL 536061

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1993

DocketNo. 93-1726

StatusPublished

This text of 627 So. 2d 1346 (State v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Burton, 627 So. 2d 1346, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 1993 WL 536061 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State has appealed from two orders. The first is one suppressing tangible evidence, to-wit: a firearm and contraband, contending that the search of the passenger compartment of a vehicle was a legal search [1347]*1347incident to an arrest. The second order is one dismissing the case.

Based upon the appellee’s candid and correct confession of error, the orders of the trial court suppressing the said evidence and dismissing the case are reversed. See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); State v. Scott, 576 So.2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Hardin v. State, 578 So.2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); State v. Gonzalez, 562 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI