State v. Burton

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Burton

111 So. 2d 34, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1610

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 17, 1959·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction. We issued the writ and set the matter for hearing on the merits as well as on the aspect of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. After such hearing we have the view that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and it is hereby discharged. 107 So.2d 140.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction. We issued the writ and set the matter for hearing on the merits as well as on the aspect of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. After such hearing we have the view that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and it is hereby discharged. 107 So.2d 140.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur.

State v. Burton, 111 So. 2d 34, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1610 (Fla. 1959).

Pincite

111 So. 2d 34 (State v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related