State v. Burton

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Burton

111 So. 2d 34, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1610

DecidedApril 17, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 2d 34 (State v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Burton, 111 So. 2d 34, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1610 (Fla. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction. We issued the writ and set the matter for hearing on the merits as well as on the aspect of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. After such hearing we have the view that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and it is hereby discharged. 107 So.2d 140.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction. We issued the writ and set the matter for hearing on the merits as well as on the aspect of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. After such hearing we have the view that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and it is hereby discharged. 107 So.2d 140.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 So. 2d 34, 1959 Fla. LEXIS 1610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burton-fla-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack