State v. Burow
This text of 2020 ND 88 (State v. Burow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 05/07/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 88
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Justin Keith Burow, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190382
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joseph K. Nwoga, Jamestown, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Scott R. Sandness, Jamestown, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Burow No. 20190382
[¶1] Justin Burow appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of committing simple assault on a correctional institution employee in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-01(2)(a), a class C felony. Burow argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the verdict. Having reviewed the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, see State v. White, 2017 ND 51, ¶ 17, 890 N.W.2d 825, we conclude the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 88, 942 N.W.2d 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burow-nd-2020.