State v. Burnside

778 N.E.2d 1050, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burnside. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 Ohio St. 3d 152
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2002·No. 2002-1524·Published

Opinion

Fairfield App. No. 01CA60, 2002-Ohio-4344. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed August 22, 2002, at page 3:

“When there is no evidence that a solid anticoagulant is used in a blood test to determine alcohol content as required by O.A.C. 3701-53-05(0) do[es] the State still meet its burden of substantial compliance with Department of Health regulations?”

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

[1459]*1459Sua sponte, cause consolidated with. 2002-1440, State v. Burnside, Fairfield App. No. 01CA60, 2002-Ohio-4344.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is State v. Zuzga (2001), 141 Ohio App.3d 696, 753 N.E.2d 229.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Burnside, 778 N.E.2d 1050, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1458 (Ohio 2002).

778 N.E.2d 1050 (State v. Burnside) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Zuzga
753 N.E.2d 229 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)