State v. Burns

847 P.2d 415, 118 Or. App. 492, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 271
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 3, 1993
Docket910432065; CA A71827
StatusPublished

This text of 847 P.2d 415 (State v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Burns, 847 P.2d 415, 118 Or. App. 492, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 271 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences on Counts 2 and 3 of the indictment without finding that it had authority to do so. State v. Racicot, 106 Or App 557, 809 P2d 726 (1991). We accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Racicot
809 P.2d 726 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 P.2d 415, 118 Or. App. 492, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burns-orctapp-1993.