State v. Burns

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Burns

203 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1502, 2006 WL 2864649

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 2006·No. No. ED 86440·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Omar Burns appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal in which he alleged that the State failed to prove Burns was aware that the objects in his possession contained cocaine. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Omar Burns appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal in which he alleged that the State failed to prove Burns was aware that the objects in his possession contained cocaine. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Burns, 203 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1502, 2006 WL 2864649 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

203 S.W.3d 238 (State v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.