State v. Burns

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Burns

694 S.W.2d 802

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burns. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4561 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1985·No. No. 49235·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Darrell Burns, was convicted, after a jury trial, of selling heroin. He appeals from the judgment of the trial court sentencing him, as a prior and persistent offender, to eighteen years’ imprisonment, to run concurrently with sentences imposed in previous causes. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Darrell Burns, was convicted, after a jury trial, of selling heroin. He appeals from the judgment of the trial court sentencing him, as a prior and persistent offender, to eighteen years’ imprisonment, to run concurrently with sentences imposed in previous causes. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Burns, 694 S.W.2d 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

694 S.W.2d 802 (State v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.