State v. Burnett

738 N.E.2d 379, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2824
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 2000
Docket00-266
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 379 (State v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Burnett, 738 N.E.2d 379, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2824 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-981003. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee show cause, within twenty days of the date of this order, why the judgment of the court of appeals should not be reversed in view of the judgment of the federal district court in Johnson v. Cincinnati (Jan. 20, 2000), S.D. Ohio No. C-1-98-441, unreported, 2000 WL 943822.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that oral argument scheduled for November 28, 2000, be continued.

Cook, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. City of Cincinnati
119 F. Supp. 2d 735 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.E.2d 379, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burnett-ohio-2000.