State v. Burke

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Burke

457 S.W.3d 396, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, 2015 WL 1476807

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 2015·No. WD 77457·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Appellant David Burke appeals his conviction for first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle, a class C felony under section 569.080.1(2), RSMo 2000. Burke’s claims of. error are not preserved because he failed to object when the challenged evidence was introduced at trial. Nevertheless, Burke contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing testimony about uncharged prior bad acts in violation of his Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Because we find no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Appellant David Burke appeals his conviction for first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle, a class C felony under section 569.080.1(2), RSMo 2000. Burke’s claims of. error are not preserved because he failed to object when the challenged evidence was introduced at trial. Nevertheless, Burke contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing testimony about uncharged prior bad acts in violation of his Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Because we find no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Burke, 457 S.W.3d 396, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, 2015 WL 1476807 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

457 S.W.3d 396 (State v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.