State v. Burke
This text of 101 P. 1133 (State v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the violation of an injunction restraining him from maintaining a nuisan.ce in a certain place in the city of Atchison. He appeals from the judgment. No question is presented which has not heretofore been determined by the decisions of this court. The evidence regarding the records of the collector of internal revenue was properly-admitted. (The State v. Schaeffer, 74 Kan. 390; The State v. Fishback, 79 Kan. 679.) There was substantial evidence to sustain the finding, and that determines the inquiry here.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 796, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burke-kan-1909.