State v. Bundy

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bundy

921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 2010·No. 2009-2135·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Montgomery App. Nos. 23063 and 23064, 2009-Ohio-5395. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II without holding. Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. Nos. 23063 and 23064, 2009-Ohio-5395. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II without holding. Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

State v. Bundy, 921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

921 N.E.2d 245 (State v. Bundy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related