State v. Bundy

921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 2010
Docket2009-2135
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 921 N.E.2d 245 (State v. Bundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bundy, 921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Montgomery App. Nos. 23063 and 23064, 2009-Ohio-5395. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II without holding. Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bundy v. State
36 N.E.3d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)
Bundy v. State
2013 Ohio 5619 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bundy-ohio-2010.