State v. Bunch

695 So. 2d 1341, 1997 La. LEXIS 1971, 1997 WL 351794
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 20, 1997·No. No. 96-KP-2761·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisor and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 286-606.

Writ granted; conviction and sentence reinstated. The district court erred in granting relief on the basis of the newly discovered evidence. First, the evidence would not warrant the granting of a new trial even if the standard of La.C.Cr.P.- art. 851(3) applied. See State v. Chapman, 436 So.2d 451, 455 (La.1983); State v. Prudholm, 446 So.2d 729, 736 (La.1984); State v. Clayton, 427 So.2d 827, 833 (La.1982); cf. Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 403-04, 113 S.Ct. 853, 862-63, 122 L.Ed.2d 203 (1993). Second, Bunch raised identical issues in an earlier application for post-conviction relief which this Court denied. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D); State ex rel. Bunch v. Whitley, 93-0193 (La. 11/29/94), 646 So.2d 395.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bunch, 695 So. 2d 1341, 1997 La. LEXIS 1971, 1997 WL 351794 (La. 1997).

695 So. 2d 1341 (State v. Bunch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrera v. Collins
506 U.S. 390 (Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Clayton
427 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)
State v. Chapman
436 So. 2d 451 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)
State v. Prudholm
446 So. 2d 729 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984)
State ex rel. Bunch v. Whitley
646 So. 2d 395 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)