State v. Bullock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Bullock

151 S.E.2d 9, 268 N.C. 560, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1256

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 23, 1966

Docket505

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 151 S.E.2d 9 (State v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bullock, 151 S.E.2d 9, 268 N.C. 560, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1256 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence is ample to support the finding of fact by the trial court that the confession was made voluntarily, without fear or hope of reward. This finding is, therefore, conclusive on appeal. State v. Barnes, 264 N.C. 517, 142 S.E. 2d 344. The trial having occurred prior to the announcement of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. ed. 2d 694, that decision has no application to this appeal. Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S. Ct. 1772, 16 L. ed. 2d 882. The admission in evidence of this confession and of the testimony of the officers concerning it was in accord with the law of this State as explained in State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence is ample to support the finding of fact by the trial court that the confession was made voluntarily, without fear or hope of reward. This finding is, therefore, conclusive on appeal. State v. Barnes, 264 N.C. 517, 142 S.E. 2d 344. The trial having occurred prior to the announcement of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. ed. 2d 694, that decision has no application to this appeal. Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S. Ct. 1772, 16 L. ed. 2d 882. The admission in evidence of this confession and of the testimony of the officers concerning it was in accord with the law of this State as explained in State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.E.2d 9, 268 N.C. 560, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bullock-nc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack