State v. Bullock

151 S.E.2d 9, 268 N.C. 560, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1256
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 23, 1966·No. 505·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence is ample to support the finding of fact by the trial court that the confession was made voluntarily, without fear or hope of reward. This finding is, therefore, conclusive on appeal. State v. Barnes, 264 N.C. 517, 142 S.E. 2d 344. The trial having occurred prior to the announcement of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. ed. 2d 694, that decision has no application to this appeal. Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S. Ct. 1772, 16 L. ed. 2d 882. The admission in evidence of this confession and of the testimony of the officers concerning it was in accord with the law of this State as explained in State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bullock, 151 S.E.2d 9, 268 N.C. 560, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1256 (N.C. 1966).

151 S.E.2d 9 (State v. Bullock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Zuniga
444 S.E.2d 443 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)
State v. Stevens
291 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Small
239 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1977)
State v. Hankerson
220 S.E.2d 575 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. Sanders
185 S.E.2d 158 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)