State v. Buisson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Buisson

169 So. 3d 381, 2015 La. LEXIS 1263, 2015 WL 3421760

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-KP-2533

StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 3d 381 (State v. Buisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Buisson, 169 So. 3d 381, 2015 La. LEXIS 1263, 2015 WL 3421760 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 496-979; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-K-1193.

Writ granted; the ruling of the court of appeal remanding the case for the appointment of counsel and an evidentiary hearing is vacated and the district court’s ruling is reinstated. The district court did not abusé its discretion when it denied relief summarily based upon its review of the pleadings. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 929(A) (“If the court determines that the factual and legal issues can be resolved based upon the application and answer, and supporting documents, including relevant transcripts, depositions, and other reliable documents submitted by either party or available to the court, the court may grant or deny relief without further proceedings.”).

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket. HUGHES, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 496-979; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-K-1193.

Writ granted; the ruling of the court of appeal remanding the case for the appointment of counsel and an evidentiary hearing is vacated and the district court’s ruling is reinstated. The district court did not abusé its discretion when it denied relief summarily based upon its review of the pleadings. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 929(A) (“If the court determines that the factual and legal issues can be resolved based upon the application and answer, and supporting documents, including relevant transcripts, depositions, and other reliable documents submitted by either party or available to the court, the court may grant or deny relief without further proceedings.”).

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket. HUGHES, J., would deny the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 So. 3d 381, 2015 La. LEXIS 1263, 2015 WL 3421760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buisson-la-2015.