State v. Buffington

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Buffington

219 N.E.2d 614, 7 Ohio App. 2d 211, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 344, 1966 Ohio App. LEXIS 438

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 1966

Docket218

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 219 N.E.2d 614 (State v. Buffington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Buffington, 219 N.E.2d 614, 7 Ohio App. 2d 211, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 344, 1966 Ohio App. LEXIS 438 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, appealing from an adverse ruling on his petition to vacate or set aside sentence filed under the provisions of Section 2953.21, Bevised Code, and claiming indigency, now moves this court to appoint counsel to conduct his appeal.

There is no constitutional or statutory provision for the appointment or fixing of compensation of counsel for an indigent prisoner to prosecute an appeal from a judgment or order entered on a petition to vacate or set aside sentence filed under the provisions of Section 2953.21, Bevised Code. Section 2953.24, Bevised Code, is not applicable, for it relates only to the appointment of counsel for the petitioner to prosecute the vacation proceedings in the court in which sentence was imposed. Sections 2941.50 and 2941.51, Bevised Code, are limited in their applicability to appeals to the assignment of counsel to conduct an appeal from a finding of guilty of a felony made at the time of the hearing at which sentence is imposed.

Motion for the appointment of counsel overruled.

Younger, P. J., Guernsey and Middleton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant, appealing from an adverse ruling on his petition to vacate or set aside sentence filed under the provisions of Section 2953.21, Bevised Code, and claiming indigency, now moves this court to appoint counsel to conduct his appeal.

There is no constitutional or statutory provision for the appointment or fixing of compensation of counsel for an indigent prisoner to prosecute an appeal from a judgment or order entered on a petition to vacate or set aside sentence filed under the provisions of Section 2953.21, Bevised Code. Section 2953.24, Bevised Code, is not applicable, for it relates only to the appointment of counsel for the petitioner to prosecute the vacation proceedings in the court in which sentence was imposed. Sections 2941.50 and 2941.51, Bevised Code, are limited in their applicability to appeals to the assignment of counsel to conduct an appeal from a finding of guilty of a felony made at the time of the hearing at which sentence is imposed.

Motion for the appointment of counsel overruled.

Younger, P. J., Guernsey and Middleton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 N.E.2d 614, 7 Ohio App. 2d 211, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 344, 1966 Ohio App. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buffington-ohioctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack